CO129-086 - Sir Robinson - 1862 [5-6] — Page 255

36.

to the guage-

to the Attorney General; and to Dr Meurray as also to one

or two merchants of the refusal of the application for a "Mitigation "

of

the Sentence

passed in 1857 upon three Chinese Envicts, and of the

dof

terms in which that refusal.

expressed but I did not communicate

dissatisfication

any

witho

a

me

to Mir Murrow on

connected with him

view to its insertion in any

Newspaper, and I certainly never

treated it

as

a

grievane

ance and

I

any

time,

directly

deny that I have, at

Ov

in directly- made Ar

Uburrows the ite positury of this

supposed grievance

the medium

of bringing it before the Public Secretary of State, I

that in

may

ov

251

the

add

my opinion nothing that

has occurred

dealt with

In submitting this letter for

ought to have been

37

مه

I freely admit I have

you knollency's fell your

instinctions, I

think it right myself

to state most

positively that I have never. otherwise than

courteous in

been

my

as

demeanor towards.

personally discourteous,

and I have said so in conversation

and in one

if not two notes I have

manner to Mr. Forth. writtin to Judge Adams; it

Signis) M. H. Alexander

on

this

Acting Colomial decretorn may be that my opinion

3rd May Thead has reached attr Murrow=

1882.

but I deny that I have directly

indirectly complained to Mr. Murrow!

in

this subject

to

to refer

or that I desired himi

himi

to it in any way, and I